By Andrew Simmons |
Posted to the Web March 24, 2007
Meles Zenawi,
the
Ethiopian prime minister, has been in power since 1991, that's longer than the
man he helped to overthrow, the communist leader Colonel Mengistu, who was last
year convicted in absentia of genocide. Most recently Zenawi has been in the
headlines for his invasion of Somalia with the support of the United States.
Andrew Simmons
went to
Addis Ababa,
the Ethiopian capital, to interview him for Talk
to Al Jazeera.
I'll
start with the issue of Somalia. You invaded nearly three months ago, you wanted
to get your troops out quickly, at least two-thirds of them are still there, are
you in a dangerous quagmire?
Meles
Zenawi: I think we should get
the facts straight
first. We did not invade Somalia. We were invited by the duly constituted government of
Somalia, internationally recognised government
of Somalia to assist them in averting the threat of terrorism. We did so. We are
not in a quagmire now; we have completed our first phase of withdrawal, we'll
complete our second phase of withdrawal in a few days' time and things are
improving in Somalia.
You
said you'll be out in a matter of weeks and you said that two months ago and the
security situation is not good. It's patently clear that it's not good.
Zenawi:
We had plans to withdraw in
weeks, but in the meantime the Africa Union decided to send troops to Somalia
and we, therefore, decided to synchronise our withdrawal with the deployment of
African Union troops.
Now that the first
contingent of Africa Union troops is in place, we'll go ahead with our
withdrawal and as the African Union troops consolidate, we'll completely
withdraw. Of course, there are challenges in Mogadishu, but the rest of Somalia
is very stable and even in the case of Mogadishu, taking into consideration the
fact that this is a city of 2.2 million people, awash with guns, the type of
security challenge we currently face are not all that unexpected or alarming.
Ugandans are coming under attack frequently, your own troops likewise - every
other day is not an exaggeration. You've hardly brought peace to Somalia, have
you?
Zenawi:
If one assumes Somalia is equal
to Mogadishu, then, of course, that could be a correct assessment, but I believe
Somalia is not equal to Mogadishu. The rest of Somalia is absolutely stable and
even in Mogadishu, while there are these challenges, these are not
insurmountable challenges. You talk of daily attacks on the Ugandans, as far as
I know, not a single Ugandan soldier has been killed since arriving in
Mogadishu. That gives you an idea of the scope and scale of the attacks which
understandably are exaggerated by the media.
What do
you mean by that?
Zenawi:
Well, people are looking for...
I mean, violence is more newsworthy than anything else. It's in the nature of
things and reports of attacks are tabulated every day, they are not fabricated
but, in the process of being reported, they tend to be given more weight than
they perhaps warrant.
Let's
look at this point and you'd expected more support from the international
community and the African Union and that has not been forthcoming in the scale
you wanted. So I'll put to you, you fought a proxy war on behalf of the US,
don't you regret it now?
Zenawi:
Well let's get the facts
straight first, we did not fight a proxy war on behalf of the United States,
indeed the United States was very ambivalent about our intervention, once we
intervened of course the United States and much of the international community
was supportive but in the initial phase before we intervened, everybody,
including the United States was warning us that we might walk into a trap and a
quagmire and that we should think twice before taking steps.
That's the first point that
I want to stress. Secondly, the African Union has been extremely helpful, it has
deployed its forces within a few months - that's much more than what the United
Nations is capable of...
But
there isn't anything like the numbers committed to this operation is needed
surely…
Zenawi:
We have 1,500 Ugandan troops in
the thick of it...
That's
nothing compared with the situation, with respect...
Zenawi:
I don't think it's the numbers
that are going to do the trick, it's going to be the reconciliation process
among the Somalis which will hopefully marginalise the terrorist elements and
therefore reduce the threat they pose to manageable proportions and I think
that's going ahead.
Before
moving on to that point, I'd like to just pick up on your assertion that the US
were not directly involved with the run up to this war because in a leaked UN
document, referred to a meeting around June 2006 between top brass military from
Ethiopia and the US in which a series of options were looked at, now this has
been documented now do you deny that there wasn't active discussion about a
military operation with the US, assistance and the US backing months and months
before the actual hostilities took place?
Zenawi:
Months and months before the
actual hostilities took place ... I ... publicly stated that we will take
military steps unless the terrorists change their ways and this public
information was shared with anybody who was interested in our view not just the
Americans, there was no military planning.
But the
point is, do you deny that the US were not involved actively with your forces
months before ... you don't deny it?
Zenawi:
They were not involved at all,
except in the form of sharing intelligence which we have done for years before
the military intervention in Somalia.
But
sharing intelligence can mean a number of things can't it, that it can be a
description of formulating options…
Zenawi:
No, we planned our military
operation, we executed it without the support, military support of anybody,
without the financial support of anybody.
I want
to pick up on the point you made about terrorism, the Islamic courts, it would
be ludicrous to suggest that the Islamic courts is wholly comprised of what some
describe as extremists, many many moderates among them and they did bring peace
to Somalia for the first time in a long time. So how do you assess your war
objectives in hindsight?
Zenawi:
I agree with you that all those
involved with the Islamic courts were not hardcore terrorists. Many of them were
rank-and-file clan militia members, but there were hardcore terrorists in the
leadership including some who were trained in Afghanistan.
Now, this assertion that
they brought peace to Mogadishu, in some ways is very
similar to assertions by some, that Hitler, for example, instilled, enforced
peace and stability in Germany after the turmoil in the Weimar republic, but the
way he did it was such that it would be obnoxious to everybody and could not be
sustained.
That's the same thing with
the establishment of peace in Mogadishu by the jihadists. They did it by
flogging women, by preventing people from going about their daily life in a
normal civilised way, and it could not have ever been sustained. The peace
brought about by the Taliban in Afghanistan was not sustained. The peace brought
about by the Taliban in Somalia would never have been sustained.
On the
issue of peace, how on earth can this be attained if you don't involve former
members of the Islamic courts in the process? You talk about reconciliation -
how can that happen if you don't bring in people from a leadership that many
ordinary Somalis respected and admired?
Zenawi:
Well, again, I think the facts
are slightly different. The overriding political divide in Somalia is not
ideological, it's not between Islamists and non-Islamists, it's among clans. The
hardcore jihadists were hiding behind clan loyalties.
By addressing this
fundamental clan division, you incorporate, inevitably, some who are associated
with the Islamic courts but who have respect within their own clans and you
marginalise those extremists who have no interest in peace and who are merely
hiding behind clan loyalties.
So I believe the
transitional government is willing and able to incorporate, to include
anyone…anybody who has respect and support within any of the Somali clans.
Do you
think then, that an ordinary Somali, their view towards Ethiopia is that you are
an occupying power, how do you address the Somali public after what's happened?
Zenawi:
That is not the overwhelming
opinion of the overwhelming majority of people in Somalia.
But
does it have to be a majority?
Zenawi:
Had it been the case, we would
not have rooted out the Islamists in four days with a very limited contingent
and we would have had fire burning throughout Somalia, that is not the case.
Clearly there are people in
Somalia who very strongly object to our intervention and we respect the opinion
of some of them and we have no intention of staying there or remaking
Somalia in our image.
We were there to support
the transitional government, we have done most of the job, we are withdrawing
most of our troops and as soon as we complete our job, and as soon as the
African Union is firmly established in Somalia, we'll move out completely.
When
will you move out completely?
Zenawi:
The second phase of our
withdrawal will take place in a few days which means less than a third of the
original contingent will be left in Somalia, and as soon as some of the other
African Union troops begin to arrive, we'll withdraw the remaining troops.
And
what happens if it deteriorates even more at that point?
Zenawi:
Well, all we can do is to try to
help the Somalis resolve their own problem. We cannot resolve it on their
behalf, we can only support them. If our support is not enough, then it will be
very unfortunate, we are not going to be sucked in to a Somali civil war.
You are
sure about that?
Zenawi:
Absolutely.
I'd
like to move on now to your deteriorating relations with your neighbour
Eritrea. How bad are things at the moment?
Zenawi:
Well, I think it would be fair
to say that they are quite bad.
And for
what reason?
Zenawi:
I think the Eritrean government
has come to the conclusion that they cannot live comfortably alongside a strong,
united Ethiopia, under any government, and have come to the conclusion that they
should try to weaken and perhaps dismantle Ethiopia to feel secure.
The
border war ended in 2000. You refused to accept the ruling of the boundary
commission. Is there any room for compromise for the sake of peace after all
this time?
Zenawi:
There is a misunderstanding
here. We did not refuse to implement the boundary commission decision, of course
we have our reservations about the decision itself, but in the end we recognise
this is a judicial decision and we have said we'll accept the decision.
We have asked for dialogue
in the implementation of the decision, we have not rejected the decision itself,
we have simply asked let's implement it, but let's implement it in a manner that
can bring about lasting piece and through that.
But you
didn't accept the ruling really, I mean there are ways of describing it but you
didn't accept the ruling, did you?
Zenawi:
That is not true, we said we'll
accept the decision in principle very clearly, we said that repeatedly and very
clearly, what we said is having accepted the decision in principle, let's move
ahead and implement it but in order to implement it, you need to implement it in
a manner that would sustain peace and let's have engagement, dialogue that is
the normal practice, it is not something that Ethiopia discovered. That's what
happened, for example, in the case of the border dispute between Nigeria and
Cameroon, they had a decision, Nigeria had it's reservations about the decision,
they said they will accept the decision in principle but that they'd want to
talk about it's implementation. They talked for three years, they agreed and
went ahead an implemented. That's a normal thing, we are simply asking for the
normal implementation process.
You've
said in the past that it takes two to tango in relation to talks. Now President
Isais Afewerki insists you need to make the first step because of this boundary
commission dispute, now for the sake of peace, the world over, leaders make a
move, a grand gesture, is there nothing you can do here?
Zenawi:
We did initially, as you
intimated earlier on, we did reject the boundary commission's decision in the
end. We said OK we have to make a very clear gesture and we said we'll accept
the decision, let's just talk about implementation, we are not going to reopen
the decision, we are simply going to discuss implementation and so I believe we
have gone more than half way to try and encourage the Eritreans to respond in
kind. They have not done so.
You
started on this issue by sounding very pessimistic; do you think there's a
danger that there could be war again?
Zenawi:
We have no intention of going to
war with Eritrea again, we would not want to do so, I believe the Eritreans
recognise that it's in their interests to try it again and so the likelihood of
war is not as high as some people think. Nevertheless that doesn't mean there's
going to be peace, it could mean that the current status of stalemate and
tension could persist for months and perhaps years.
I'm
sure you'd agree that the horn of Africa is going through a very difficult time
in view of your actions in Somalia and the present situation in Eritrea.
Zenawi:
I don't, I don't agree with
that. The Horn of Africa is much safer now than it was in December, in spite of
the conflict in Somalia and the tension in Eritrea, the Horn of Africa is doing
very well economically the bulk of the population lives in Ethiopia and Ethiopia
is doing very well economically, we are going ahead with all our plans, so I
don't think ... I can't say the Horn of Africa is very stable and safe but I
cannot say that it is deteriorating either.
What implications do you
think the recent kidnapping incident in North of your country has in view of
relations with Eritrea.
Zenawi:
We in Ethiopia look at this not
in isolation but in the context of prevision activities of the Eritrean
government to try and destabilise Ethiopia. There were a spate of bombings in
Addis last year, these were carried out by people recruited, supported by the
Eritrean government. Recently we have caught an Eritrean agent of the Eritrean
government who was involved in trying to carry out bombing activities during the
African Union summit here. All of these cases are before court now and so we
think this is just a continuation of involvement with terrorism that the
Eritrean government unfortunately appears to be more and more immersed in.
Isn't
there a time, anytime soon, when the rhetoric has to stop and you talk with
President Isaias, you both fought the same enemy many years ago ... Mengistu?
Zenawi:
Sure, not only the rhetoric, but
the tension and the problems have to come to an end, they could easily come to
an end, we have offered to talk to the Eritrean government any time, any place
but as I said before ... it takes two to tango and we don't have a party [sic]
at the moment.
And I'd
now like to address your background in terms of human rights, how would you
assess your record on human rights?
Zenawi:
We've made tremendous
improvements in the human rights record so far in Ethiopia but, of course, this
is not a perfect situation, it's a work in progress.
What
about the anti-government demonstrations in 2005, the lives lost, the clamp down
you ordered after the elections, do you regret that?
Zenawi:
I regret the deaths as you know,
up to 194 civilians died, six policemen were killed, more than 70 policemen were
wounded, I regret all these deaths but there was a challenge to the
constitutional order in Ethiopia and that challenge had to be faced.
It
changed the world's view or many leaders in the world, their view towards you as
a leader ... that round of violence in your country, didn't it?
Zenawi:
I doubt whether it changed the
view of world leaders, but it clearly tarnished the image of Ethiopia.
Because
I have in front of me here a report from the US department of state which is
very recent and it's 23 pages on the human rights record in Ethiopia and it
refers to the inquiry which was implemented after the deaths, 193 deaths in the
antigovernment protests, and it highlights the fact that the chairman and vice
chairman of that inquiry left the country allegedly because they had been
threatened, and they had voted, the majority vote was in favour of the fact that
there was undue unnecessary force used against protestors, now that decision was
reversed after they left the country.
Zenawi:
That is not the case.
It's
here in the department of state report. Have you read it?
Zenawi:
I have not read it, but I know
having read the department of state reports on human rights for over a decade
now that they do tend to get things wrong, that what they write is not always
the last word in the Bible.
There's
reference to wholesale, large numbers of people disappearing, people who were
involved in these demonstrations, we already know that there has been levels of
repression used in your country, defending it, on the basis that it was
necessary but here, the suggestion is that it was wholly unnecessary and this
level of repression is inexcusable. What do you say to that?
Zenawi:
Well, people are entitled to
their own opinion in the case of Ethiopia, we took people to court, they've had
their day in court we are still waiting for the verdict of the court, we
detained a large number of people immediately after the attempted insurrection
but we released them within weeks, the vast majority of them were released
within weeks, the 100 or so were detained and taken to court. I do not believe
that is a disproportionate response to a concerted effort to bring about a
change in government by force.
This is
Africa's second most populated country. It has a wealth of resources and
energy, don't you think you should be more democratic in the way you run
Ethiopia?
Zenawi:
We are democratic in the way we
run Ethiopia, we've been elected by the people.
Aside
from the engineering, one wouldn't dispute the structure being democratic, it's
the policies used, officially or unofficially by your security services and your
security forces against Ethiopians I'm asking about.
Zenawi:
Well, as I said, there has been
tremendous democratic progress in this country including the last election,
everybody who observed the last election says that it was an exemplary election
campaign and that things began to get wrong after the polling and contrary to
what some have suggested, every government I know, including every government in
Europe has clearly recognized that we did not steal the elections, that we won
the last elections, not just the last but the previous elections too so the
fundamental structure is democratic, is there room for improvement? I do not
know of any country where there is no room for improvement.
And
what about the way you run the security services and security forces which is
what I asked you. Would you not agree that perhaps you need to review policies
in a way?
Zenawi:
Yes, we need to review our
policies on a daily basis, beef up the capacity to manage such crisis without
bloodshed and more effectively, and more humanely, we need to do that every day
and we've been doing that since the day we got here to Addis.
Finally
can I ask you, how would you like to be remembered in history? You've been in
power a long time, how would you like to be remembered in history?
Zenawi:
I would like to be remembered as
someone who got Ethiopia off to a good track, a democratic one, one ... where
Ethiopia's proverbial poverty begins to be tackled in an effective way. I'd like
to be remembered as someone who started the process.
Thank
you very much Meles Zenawi for taking part in the programme. That's all we've
got time for in
Talk to Al Jazeera, from me Andrew Simmons, goodbye.
----
Source: Al-Jazeera, March 19, 2007
Ethiomedia.com - Premier news and information source.
© Copyright 2001-2007 Ethiomedia.com. EMAIL: editor@ethiomedia.com